Ram, There was some design discussion about this here [1], see the part about "getAuthorizationHistory", but I don't think we currently have any JIRAs defined.
The file-based authorizer provided in the 1.0.0 release does not provide this capability yet, so you would need to implement a custom authorizer that wrapped the file-based authorizer and then did something with the results. Another option is to use Ranger as the authorizer for NiFi, Ranger provides auditing and typically stores the audit logs in Solr. -Bryan [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Support+Authorizer+API On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Nathamuni, Ramanujam <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > > > Thanks, Yes. How do we get the audit log from NiFi? I need to integrate > the audit log with IBM aveksa or IBM Guradium every day. > > > > Thanks, > > Ram > > > > *From:* Bryan Bende [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2016 10:20 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: What next with NiFi > > > > Ram, > > > > Are you talking about isolation from a security perspective? If so, that > is now available in the 1.0.0 release. > > > > You can restrict access to any portion of the flow through a policy model. > > > > -Bryan > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Nathamuni, Ramanujam <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Joe and Team: > > Enterprise needs very high data security and audit trial. What is the > vision to have canvas/processor/processor group ...etc. isolated for > project/LOBs? > > Thanks, > Ram > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 9:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: What next with NiFi > > Gunjan > > The best indicator of areas of focus I think are listed here > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > > In a roadmap discussion thread back in January of this year the items > mentioned specifically as trailing the 1.0 release were extension and > variable registries. > > Which items will get addressed in which order is perhaps less precise and > more a function of where contributions occur. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Gunjan Dave <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello NiFi team, now that version 1.0.0 is out in open, what are the > > next big ticket plans? > > I saw 1.1.0 jiras but those are mostly bug fixes and minor > > enhacements, but what are the larger plans from the existing roadmap? > > > > ************************************************************************* > This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender > immediately and then delete it. > > TIAA > ************************************************************************* > > > > > ************************************************************************* > This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender > immediately and then delete it. > > TIAA > ************************************************************************* >
