Hey Jeff,

Just to hone in a bit more, MiNiFi would likely consume from some of the
work surrounding the Command and Control [1] efforts.

There is some initial work under way which should serve as a nice
foundation to start exploring a more full featured and richer
implementation.  Certainly plan to further expand and update docs as we
learn a bit more through design and seeing what supports the common needs.
Would certainly invite you to evaluate how it would apply to your uses and
comment, if it is of interest.

Thanks!

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MINIFI/MiNiFi+Command+and+Control

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jeff Zemerick <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
> No, the documentation is clear that is currently only available
> implementation. Since it was designed to be extendable, I was wondering if
> there were any example cases in which using the WholeConfigDifferentiator 
> might
> not be the ideal differentiator and I should provide my own implementation.
> WholeConfigDifferentiator's implementation seems simple, fast, and to the
> point. I wasn't aware of the NiFi-Registry project so that helps me see the
> bigger picture.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Joe Percivall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Jeff,
>>
>> Glad to hear the WholeConfigDifferentiator is working well. While it is
>> configurable, that is currently the only implementation. Is there a
>> specific place that suggests there are currently more implementations? The
>> documentation lists it as the only one[1]. When I wrote it up I implemented
>> it in such a way so that we could easily add other differentiators in the
>> future. One such example is once we have the NiFi-Registry in place, a
>> differentiator that takes advantage of whatever the uniqueness scheme that
>> is implemented for that.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/blob/master/minifi
>> -docs/src/main/markdown/System_Admin_Guide.md#automatic-warm-redeploy
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Jeff Zemerick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> MiNiFi's WholeConfigDifferentiator along with
>>> the PullHttpChangeIngestor is working well for me. I see that
>>> the differentiator is configurable and additional implementations can be
>>> provided. Are there any examples of circumstances in which the using
>>> WholeConfigDifferentiator would not be the best choice?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Joe Percivall*
>> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
>> e: [email protected]
>>
>
>

Reply via email to