Thank you very much Pierre and Joe. I do now understand and appreciate your insights.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > ...but in the meantime it can process others... > > On Jun 29, 2017 8:40 AM, "Pierre Villard" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> That's correct. When going in the failure relationship, the flow files >> are penalized with a duration of 30s (by default, this can be changed in >> the processor configuration) and the processor will try to process the flow >> files only once this duration expired. >> >> Pierre >> >> 2017-06-29 14:36 GMT+02:00 James McMahon <[email protected]>: >> >>> Good morning. In a stream of files I am reading into a workflow there >>> appear to be a small few that contain non-standard characters in the file >>> name. I haven't fully evaluated the nature of these characters, but they do >>> not appear to be utf-8. I need to delve more into the problem. >>> >>> In the PutFile processor late in my workflow processing these files are >>> sent to the processor's failure queue. Am I correct in assuming that >>> subsequent files can still be serviced by the PutFile processor, and that >>> the processor does not block all subsequent file processing due to the one >>> in the failure queue? Is the behavior dependent on any particular >>> configuration settings for the processor or for the queue? >>> >>> Thank you very much in advance for the clarification. -Jim >>> >> >>
