Mark,

The user guide is not necessarily going to mention every processor.

The official list is available down the side of the docs page [1].

I don't believe there is currently a way to find all source
processors, it is mentioned in the docs of each processor under the
"Input Requirement".

Might be a nice addition to automatically create a tag for processors
with input requirement of forbidden.

[1] https://nifi.apache.org/docs.html

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Mark Rachelski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you Bryan,
>
> That should fit my purposes well.
>
> BTW: That processor is not in the User Guide.
>
> As a follow on question, is there an easy way to ask NiFi for all processors
> that can be used at the beginning of a flow? There are a lot of other
> tagging that is done. But I spent a few hours last night googling for an
> answer before posting this question into the mail group.
>
> Mark.
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:33 AM Bryan Bende <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> You can use GeneratFlowFile as the initial processor to trigger your flow.
>>
>> Make sure to change the run schedule appropriately otherwise you will get
>> a lot of flow files generated.
>>
>> -Bryan
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:08 PM Mark Rachelski <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a scenario where I need to make an HTTP request to an API but
>>> taking context into account from previous invocations. Specifically, one
>>> query string parameter is a time where the API returns all records from that
>>> time or later. Every day, I would issue a new request using the previous
>>> time requested.
>>>
>>> I have worked out that I can store the last time requested in the state
>>> store. And use an UpdateAttributes process to retrieve it or initialize it
>>> on the first run. I can then feed that into the InvokeHTTP processor and
>>> build a dynamic URL from that attribute.
>>>
>>> But my main problem is that I don't know what beginning processor to use
>>> in this flow. UpdateAttribute needs an inbound connection. And there are no
>>> obvious 'dummy' beginning processors that I can find in the vast array. The
>>> only thing I need from the beginning processor is the schedule tab.
>>>
>>> Any ideas on what my first processor in this flow should be?
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for any help,
>>> Mark.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile

Reply via email to