Bryan , Thanks for your response , We are going with individual repositories. Can you explain what are the cons of having a shared content repository between multiple nodes ? I may be asking a dumb question but we are trying to understand if shared filers increase the throughput of the system.
Thanks Karthik -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Bende [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 11:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [EXT] Re: NiFi Clustering Hello, Each node must have its own repositories, you can't point multiple nodes at the same repositories. The repositories for a given node could be on local disk, or on a mounted network drive, but local disk will likely have the best performance. Thanks, Bryan On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Karthik Kothareddy (karthikk) [CONT - Type 2] <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > > > We are trying to setup a new NiFi (1.4.0) cluster with 3 nodes, and > trying to decide on how should we proceed with the repository > structure. Should we be pointing the same repositories for all nodes > (shared filers accessible by all 3 nodes) or give separate local > repositories for all three nodes and let each node has its own data > copy. Is there any recommendation for this for better performance and > throughput? > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > -Karthik
