thanks for your response! especially because I saw your name in that Jira :)
I think it makes sense to "keep trying until you're successful".
I am a bit confused by "yield" and "penalize" parameters. Can you give me
an example how they are used? Let's say, I use ExecuteSQL processor and
route failure rel to itself. Then I set Penalty duration to 5 minutes and
Yield duration to 1 minute and my source database is down for
maintenance at the time. I am playing with different scenarios here but not
sure I understand what I am seeing.
I've read the docs 5 times now and still confused :)
And what do you think about that solution, proposed by Alessio? looks
simple and efficient to me and uses only one extra processor
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Boris,
> Using the UpdateAttribute and RouteOnAttribute approach is only necessary
> when you want
> to retry N number of times (or for some time period) and after that
> elapses to treat the data
> differently. Most of the time, though, what is used is to simply loop the
> 'failure' relationship back
> to the processor itself. So failures would simply remain in the flow,
> trying indefinitely. When a processor
> is unable to communicate with some external service due to some
> intermittent issue, that processor
> generally should "yield", meaning that the processor will not be triggered
> for some amount of time
> (by default it is 1 second).
> So in this way, it's very simple to just say "keep trying until you're
> successful." You could also set "age-off"
> to occur so that if the data is more than say 1 hour old you can have nifi
> automatically just discard the data.
> There are some situations, though, in which users will need to try for say
> 10 times and then route the data differently.
> We could definitely improve that experience instead of having to use
> UpdateAttribute / RouteOnAttribute. But from
> my experience simply looping until successful is the most common scenario
> and so that's probably why we've not
> really seen much traction there.
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Boris Tyukin <bo...@boristyukin.com> wrote:
> Just found this Jira
> I am surprised it has not got any traction after 3 years...Having used
> Apache Airflow for a while, I am looking to retry capabilities in NiFi and
> it seems it comes down to "build your own" flow approach, that would handle
> retries in a loop and then sleeping for some time. The best alternative
> solution I found was suggested by Alessio Palma
> IMHO it still would be nice to have retry capabilities like with Apache
> Airflow. You can specify a global retry behavior for a flow or specify
> retry options per task/processor. This helps a lot to deal with
> intermittent issues, like losing network connection or source database
> system, being down for maintenance. Airflow can also send an email on retry
> and supports a bunch of other parameters around retries:
> - *retries* (*int*) – the number of retries that should be performed
> before failing the task
> - *retry_delay* (*timedelta*) – delay between retries
> - *retry_exponential_backoff* (*bool*) – allow progressive longer
> waits between retries by using exponential backoff algorithm on retry delay
> (delay will be converted into seconds)
> - *max_retry_delay* (*timedelta*) – maximum delay interval between
> - *on_retry_callback* – much like the on_failure_callback except that
> it is executed when retries occur.
> Is everyone using UpdateAttribute and RouteOnAttribute and Sleep method
> to implement retries?