Looks like a great idea to me as well.
//Jorge ________________________________ From: Otto Fowler <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 12:55:47 PM To: Pierre Villard; [email protected] Subject: Re: Default scheduling I think this is a great idea. I have done this myself with a ‘metered’ api using the AWS Web Gateway Api version of InvokeHttp ( https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2588 shameless plug ). I can’t think of how 0s would ever be a sane default. On April 26, 2018 at 04:18:04, Pierre Villard ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: Hi there, Since few versions already, it's now possible to define default values for scheduling of the components using a dedicated annotation. Example @DefaultSchedule(strategy = SchedulingStrategy.TIMER_DRIVEN, period = "1 min") I'm wondering if the community would be OK about setting a default scheduling for the "Input" processors (where incoming relationship is forbidden). My point is: I see inexperienced users starting processors that should not run with the default scheduling of 0s (because they just forget about this setting). Problem is that for some processors this could harm the remote system the processor is connected to. One recent example I saw (even though it's not an "input" processor) is with InvokeHTTP: if we forget to change the scheduling, it'll send thousands of requests to the remote service and could have negative impact on it. Thoughts?
