This is a follow-on question to Apache/HortonWorks, rather than an answer to 
the question posted by Marcelo. Outside of CaptureChangeMySQL, are there plans 
underway to add similar processors for other databases? I realize that a 
database would have to produce a capture data change log for this feature to be 
implemented inexpensively. One of the objections that I that I constantly have 
to face in my organization to NiFi adaptation is that ExecuteSQL would require 
polling thus affecting performance of the source DBMS system. I realize that 
this objection is silly and if modification/creation timestamp column in the 
table is indexed, selecting the rows that have been added/modified after last 
run date in ExecuteSQL would barely affect the server. But as a consulting 
architect, I have to deal with non-technical clients who make their decisions 
based on buzz words and they have heard of change data capture logs marketed 
advantages. Thanks.

From: Marcelo Terres <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 5:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: CaptureChangeMySQL and Triggers

Hello.

Is someone here using CaptureChangeMySQL processor to get data from a table 
which data is generated and managed by triggers/stored procedures?

I'm having some weird issues as data not being processed in case of specific 
inserts and also some weird data being generated in case of simple operations 
(3 objects in one update operation, for example).

Thanks in advance,

Regards,

Marcelo H. Terres
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
https://www.mundoopensource.com.br
https://twitter.com/mhterres
https://linkedin.com/in/marceloterres

STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY The information contained in this email message 
and any attachments may be confidential and legally privileged and is intended 
for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient, 
please: (1) notify me immediately by replying to this message; (2) do not use, 
disseminate, distribute or reproduce any part of the message or any attachment; 
and (3) destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.

Reply via email to