Peter, Are you configuring the service as a trust-only configuration? If so, that's been addressed in the 1.10 which is due for release in the near(ish) future.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6228 Thanks, Mike On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Peter Moberg <[email protected]> wrote: > As a follow-up. > > On the Nifi node I am able to do a GET to Elastic Search using curl. I > specify the —cacert option giving it the self-signed root certificate. > > Of course, this isn’t using the TrustStore but I am able to use the > TrustStore if I use other ES processors… just not the > ElasticSearchClientServicesImpl. > > On Oct 18, 2019, 12:48 AM -0500, Peter Moberg <[email protected]>, > wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > thanks for your suggestions. Here is what I have tried so far (still no > luck). > > Connecting with openssl and viewing the certs it presents > > *openssl s_client -connect quickstart-es-http.es > <http://quickstart-es-http.es>-cluster -showcerts* > > If I then look inside the server cert I can find this > > > > > > *Server Cert: Issuer: OU = quickstart, CN = quickstart-http X509v3 Subject > Alternative Name: DNS:quickstart-es-http.es > <http://quickstart-es-http.es>-cluster.es.local, DNS:quickstart-es-http, > DNS:quickstart-es-http.es <http://quickstart-es-http.es>-cluster.svc, > DNS:quickstart-es-http.es <http://quickstart-es-http.es>-cluster* > > > If I look in to the self-signed root cert I find this: > > > *Root Cert: Subject: OU = quickstart, CN = quickstart-http* > > > I now double check my trust store to make sure the Root Cert is there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Trust store content Your keystore contains 1 entry Alias name: ca_elastic > Creation date: Oct 16, 2019 Entry type: trustedCertEntry Owner: > CN=quickstart-http, OU=quickstart Issuer: CN=quickstart-http, OU=quickstart > Serial number: 5aa50b6806d2394fff6f98d2b7d4c287 Valid from: Fri Oct 11 > 14:35:01 UTC 2019 until: Sat Oct 10 14:36:01 UTC 2020 Certificate > fingerprints: MD5: 1E:E3:33:13:EA:AC:B5:61:23:DE:2E:1A:D7:9C:AA:F0 SHA1: > 62:EC:5B:EB:32:6A:38:3D:6A:6B:F7:10:5A:DE:E6:F1:F0:5B:07:99 SHA256: > B4:B5:06:9C:50:5F:E8:A1:58:7C:C7:2C:37:52:2F:E0:CF:32:18:18:68:E4:C7:37:F8:82:B3:BC:61:EB:5B:CF > Signature algorithm name: SHA256withRSA Subject Public Key Algorithm: > 2048-bit RSA key Version: 3 Extensions: #1: ObjectId: 2.5.29.19 > Criticality=true BasicConstraints:[ CA:true PathLen:2147483647 ] #2: > ObjectId: 2.5.29.37 Criticality=false ExtendedKeyUsages [ serverAuth > clientAuth ] #3: ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true KeyUsage [ > DigitalSignature Key_CertSign ]* > > So everything looks Ok. But when I run the ElasticSearchClientServicesImpl > with a SSLContext pointing to my trust store I still get the following > output in the log. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: General SSLEngine problem > at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:192) at > sun.security.ssl.SSLEngineImpl.fatal(SSLEngineImpl.java:1728) at > sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.fatalSE(Handshaker.java:330) at > sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.fatalSE(Handshaker.java:322) at > sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificate(ClientHandshaker.java:1633) > at > sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.processMessage(ClientHandshaker.java:216) > at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.processLoop(Handshaker.java:1052) at > sun.security.ssl.Handshaker$1.run(Handshaker.java:992) at > sun.security.ssl.Handshaker$1.run(Handshaker.java:989) at > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at > sun.security.ssl.Handshaker$DelegatedTask.run(Handshaker.java:1467) at > org.apache.http.nio.reactor.ssl.SSLIOSession.doRunTask(SSLIOSession.java:283) > at > org.apache.http.nio.reactor.ssl.SSLIOSession.doHandshake(SSLIOSession.java:353) > ... 9 common frames omitted Caused by: > sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find > valid certification path to requested target at > sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.doBuild(PKIXValidator.java:397) at > sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.engineValidate(PKIXValidator.java:302) > at sun.security.validator.Validator.validate(Validator.java:262) at > sun.security.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.validate(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:324) > at > sun.security.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.checkTrusted(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:281) > at > sun.security.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.checkServerTrusted(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:136) > at > sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificate(ClientHandshaker.java:1620) > ... 17 common frames omitted* > > Both the Nifi install and Elastic Search install is running in Kubernetes. > The address I am using is a service address that is backed by 3 ES > instances. However, I double checked all three of the ES nodes to make sure > that they returned back the same SSL cert and they did. > > The only thing I haven't been able to figure out is how to check if > Kubernetes/ES reacts differently when you do a GET vs POST. Feels strange > that it would return different SSL certs but stranger things have happened… > > > > On Oct 17, 2019, 3:25 PM -0500, Andy LoPresto <[email protected]>, > wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > If you can use openssl’s s_client command (example below) to connect to > the endpoint and verify that the hostname matches the certificate and that > the certificate contains a SubjectAlternativeName entry with that hostname > (see RFC 6125 [1] for more details), this should help you debug the issue. > The cause of the PKIX error is that the truststore doesn’t contain a > certificate (or certificate chain) which matches the hostname presented by > the remote endpoint. I think you understand that based on your message. The > underlying reason for this is could be one of the following: > > * the server is behind an interface which responds differently to GET and > POST/PUT requests > * there is a load-balancer which is directing the requests coincidentally > to different backend servers (one has the right cert; the other doesn’t) > * I recall something around the addition of (some) Elastic Search > components which handled TLS in an ES client-specific manner; I remember > advocating for standard NiFi TLS interaction here but I am not sure what > was ultimately contributed. If it’s not one of the above issues, I can > investigate further. > > Hopefully this helps. > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125#section-6.4.4 > > s_client example: > > $ openssl s_client -connect <host:port> -debug -state -cert > <path_to_your_cert.pem> -key <path_to_your_key.pem> -CAfile > <path_to_your_CA_cert.pem> > > Andy LoPresto > [email protected] > *[email protected] <[email protected]>* > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 > > On Oct 16, 2019, at 8:37 PM, Peter Moberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have an Elastic Search cluster that is setup with SSL. It uses a > self-signed cert for this. I am working with Apache Nifi 1.9.2. I have a > flow that has the PutElasticSearchHttp component. I have setup a > SSLContextService for that component where I have specified a trust store > that has the self-signed cert from ES. I specify an https endpoint to > access Elastic Search and Im having no issues populating my Elastic Search > instance using this flow. > > I have another flow where I want to do some lookups. So I have been using > the LookupRecord processor. That one I have associated with an > ElasticSearchClientServiceImpl which I have setup to point to the same > SSLContextService as used above. I specified the same HTTPS Url (triple > checked this). However, when I run this second Flow I am not able to verify > the ES server's self-signed certificate. > > I check the nifi-app.log and it says: > Caused by: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > unable to find valid certification path to requested target > > I am a bit surprised that I am not able to verify the same server > certificate in the two different flows. > > Completely stuck on this so if anyone have any pointers please let me know. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > >
