Ok. That's not m'y usecase, si put penalty to 0. Understood, thanks a lot
Le lun. 10 févr. 2020 à 17:29, Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Etienne, > > The penalty duration is particularly useful when you have the relationship > going back to the ExecuteSQL processor (self-loop). In that case, you don't > want to constantly hit the database and give some time before trying again. > > HTH, > Pierre > > Le lun. 10 févr. 2020 à 06:03, Etienne Jouvin <lapinoujou...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Put 0 seconds to penalized and it goes to the logger processor without >> waiting. >> >> That's fine. >> >> I just do not understand weel why there is a penalty or yield failure, >> but now that I know this, this is ok. >> >> >> Le lun. 10 févr. 2020 à 14:58, Etienne Jouvin <lapinoujou...@gmail.com> >> a écrit : >> >>> Mark, >>> >>> Hum fine, I was looking the source code and touch this point ;) >>> >>> Thanks a lot. >>> I am going to play with that. >>> >>> Etienne >>> >>> >>> Le lun. 10 févr. 2020 à 14:55, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Etienne, >>>> >>>> When a FlowFile fails, ExecuteSQL penalizes the FlowFile. This allows >>>> you to loop failures without constantly hitting the database. By default, >>>> the FlowFile will be penalized for 60 seconds. See [1] for more information >>>> on how penalization works and how to configure the penalty duration. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Mark >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://nifi.apache.org/docs/nifi-docs/html/user-guide.html#settings-tab >>>> >>>> > On Feb 10, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Etienne Jouvin <lapinoujou...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hello All. >>>> > >>>> > Here is an extract of my process >>>> > <image.png> >>>> > >>>> > If the executeSQL failed (invalid SQL for example), the flowfile goes >>>> to the failure relation. >>>> > At very first, I call the update attribute and I saw that the >>>> flowfile is kept into the relation, never proceeded. >>>> > So I try to put intermediate processor, LogMessage, but this is the >>>> same. >>>> > >>>> > Notice that I do not have this in the success relation. >>>> > >>>> > Does someone have this also ? >>>> > >>>> > Regards >>>> > >>>> > Etienne Jouvin >>>> > >>>> >>>>
