Hi. Reanimating our previous discussion.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:26 AM Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not aware of any specific work done for CPP in this fashion. Could you > provide more details on the functionality you are suggesting? Is this > providing analogous functionality of NiFi's interface for MiNiFi? > Yes, probably. Since any real-world business intelligence assumes that human-to-machine interaction assume proper limitations on visibility, accessibility of UI controls (input and output controls, at least) - it would make sense to give MiNiFi control on computational capabilities, for the widgets, to avoid computing and exclude unnecessarily re-drawing (if there wouldn't be a predicted need in transferring ingested data chunks into NiFi, use any NiFi's processors on the server). More ordinary and predicted options, combined with the above ones, if about so-called validation of the use input (internal capabilities of the UI toolkit, like QT/FLTK/... could be used) - but auto-generated input would always suggest providing dedicated controls, not the average text box. So I am assuming that is guaranteed, in such a way. Advanced options have sense for reflecting some text, graphics (vector, raster) at specific widgets - and tracking of end-users acknowledgement (UX features) would be a good matter of the data stream. Some controls would assume clicking, touching something - that could be a good option for even driven messaging. Ivan > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 8:29 PM Ivan Serdyuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I was curious if any end-users of >> https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp tried to integrate and support >> integrations MiNiFi and UI toolkits (in a proper way), for handling >> dataflow from/info UI forms/controls (labels?). >> >> I have suggested the following list (sorting by predicted priority): >> >> >> - >> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/get-started/create-a-basic-windows-10-app-in-cpp >> >> - Qt >> - MFC >> - http://wxwidgets.org/ >> - WTL >> - https://www.gtkmm.org/en/ >> >> So for > >> - https://www.fltk.org/ >> >> I have posted this: https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/fltkgeneral/AJjHk9IpoNQ/Rdwk86lBBQAJ > >> - http://fox-toolkit.org/ >> - http://nanapro.org/en-us/ >> - https://www.ultimatepp.org/ >> - https://juce.com/ >> >> Ivan >> >> >
