I don't recall the specific details but when I used MQTT processors [1] with latest version of MiNiFi Java, I *think* I could not use the latest version of NiFi NARs, I had to use code from a previous NiFi version and cherry-pick some code (open pull request) I needed for my use case [2]. Having said that, I'm not 100% sure - I might be mixing things up with an even older version of MiNiFi. If there is an issue, it should not be too hard to solve though, and happy to give pointers here.
[1] https://medium.com/google-cloud/running-visual-quality-inspection-at-the-edge-with-google-cloud-and-apache-nifi-minifi-45282ce7af2d [2] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3392 Le mar. 21 juil. 2020 à 19:35, Joe Witt <[email protected]> a écrit : > ...right nars should generally port well. > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:25 AM Jeremy Pemberton-Pigott < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Joe, that's really helpful, I have an immediate use for the Java >> version. If I wanted to use the ConsumeMQTT processor from say 1.11.4, so >> that I can get the UUID Client ID feature, is that easy to do by just >> moving the jar over or something else has to be done or I'm limited to a >> specific NiFi version? >> >> Jeremy >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:52 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Jeremy >>> >>> MiNiFi Java is basically a headless version of NiFi with some added >>> configuration ease of use items appropriate to that model. It has proven >>> too hard to slice time for that versus NiFi so I think what will end up >>> happening is that minifi java as a standalone source repository will just >>> fade out and instead we'll make 'MiNiFi Java' an assembly/convenience >>> binary that builds from the same source repository as NiFi itself. Matt >>> Burgess is doing a lot of work here in this regard. >>> >>> So in short - yeah this is still very actively developed. Just that >>> 'where it is done' is shifting back into the mothership of NiFi itself so >>> to speak. >>> >>> MiNiFi CPP is another one to look at depending on your needs/scenario. >>> Also under very active development. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:39 AM Jeremy Pemberton-Pigott < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Can someone help out with the version of NiFi that MiNiFi tracks? The >>>> Java version seems to be at 0.5 for a long time while the C++ version is >>>> 0.7. I'm also wondering if MiNiFi is actively developed or is it risky to >>>> include it in new projects? >>>> >>>> Jeremy >>>> >>>
