We use a custom start script for the pod that does a git pull and checkout
of the environment-specific branch - can't recall why but we didn't use the
Registry built-in pull mechanism (might have been branch related or
something else I've forgotten).


Cheers,

Chris Sampson

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 14:43 Chris McKeever, <cgmckee...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Chris, this may be a silly RTFM manual question, but I couldnt find a
> way to set the branch .. now that I write this, I wonder if you use the
> *?ref=BRANCH* trick
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:30 AM Chris Sampson <chris.samp...@naimuri.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We use a similar approach.
>>
>> We only allow our dev environment to write to the git repo (this is
>> controlled by using different tokens to authenticate with our git server -
>> one is read/write, others read-only).
>>
>> We have each environment using its own branch of the git repo (e.g. dev,
>> staging, prod) and have a manual step to merge any changes between branches
>> as part of our deployment process.
>>
>> Our Registry instances use the default h2 database and essentially treat
>> it as ephemeral - every time an instance is restarted, it needs to rebuild
>> its metadata database from the git repo. This is straight forward for us as
>> we're deploying into a kubernetes environment, so the h2 files are on a
>> filesystem that doesn't persist through a Pod restart.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Chris Sampson
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 14:16 Sim, Yoosuk, <yoosuk....@bell.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, I have a little bit more updates to the issue.
>>>
>>> I did find that I was mistaken about pulling: nifi registry’s local git
>>> does pull from remote git repo. When I checked the nifi-registry’s local
>>> git storage, multiple ones were fully synced with remote git. However, even
>>> though they were synced, nifi-registry itself did not recognize buckets
>>> that were not created by the nifi-registry (I think), which meant only a
>>> subset of the folders in the repo was shown as buckets by the nifi import
>>> process.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The only way to resolve it yet was to do something similar to
>>> Hesselmann’s method: we dropped the metadata backend database in postgresql
>>> and redeploy nifi-registry to repopulate the metadata. This worked, but it
>>> certainly does introduce complications in the development process.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At the moment, I am more inclined to give one git dedicated to one nifi
>>> registry, unless I can find a simpler way to handle nifi-registry sync
>>> issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tony Sim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Hesselmann, Brian <brian.hesselm...@cgi.com>
>>> *Sent:* June-07-21 3:58 PM
>>> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
>>> *Subject:* [EXT]Re: Nifi Registry GitFlowPersistenceProvider
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The easiest way I found to sync nifi registry from Git is by deleting
>>> the registry database file(should be in /nifi-registry/database/*.db) and
>>> restarting nifi-registry. After that it should fully reflect all changes in
>>> the git repository. Basically our process is something like: push changes
>>> to nifi registry on dev branch, merge from dev to master branch, delete
>>> nifi registry database on master and restart nifi registry.
>>>
>>> I'm sure there must be a nicer way to do this, but so far this has
>>> worked for us until we can spent more time on implementing the registry.
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *Van:* Chris McKeever <cgmckee...@gmail.com>
>>> *Verzonden:* maandag 7 juni 2021 16:49:21
>>> *Aan:* users@nifi.apache.org
>>> *Onderwerp:* Re: Nifi Registry GitFlowPersistenceProvider
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> EXTERNAL SENDER: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless
>>> you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
>>> EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE: Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce
>>> jointe à moins qu’ils ne proviennent d’un expéditeur fiable, ou que vous
>>> ayez l'assurance que le contenu provient d'une source sûre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tony - did you ever get an answer on this?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 9:04 AM Chris McKeever <cgmckee...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> oooh, this is interesting ... I know only one registry could/should be
>>> the authoritative WRITER ..
>>>
>>> maybe there is a fetch hook that you can schedule to refresh ...
>>> following
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:50 AM Sim, Yoosuk <yoosuk....@bell.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am currently setting  up Nifi Registry. In our setup, we wanted
>>> multiple Nifi Registry to talk to the same remote git repository. (say, one
>>> in DEV, and another in QA, etc.)
>>>
>>> Over time, I found that not all Nifi Registry retained the same
>>> information, even though the remote git repository had the latest
>>> information.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does Nifi Registry ever pull from the remote git aside from when it
>>> clones?
>>>
>>> What might be the best way to resolve this issue?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: logo_bell_120dpi_0_84_154]
>>>
>>> Yoosuk (Tony) Sim
>>>
>>> Dev, Machine Learning Engineering
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *External Email:** Please use caution when opening links and
>>> attachments / **Courriel externe:** Soyez prudent avec les liens et
>>> documents joints *
>>>
>>

Reply via email to