Just tried Java 8_u301, but it didn't change anything. Still the same behaviour.
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: "Axel Schwarz" <axelkop...@emailn.de> Datum: 27.07.2021 12:42:42 An: users@nifi.apache.org Betreff: Re: Re: No Load Balancing since 1.13.2 > I did indeed, but I updated from u161 to u291, as this was the newest > version > at that time, because I thought it could help. So the issue started under > u161. But I just saw that u301 is out. I will try this as well. >--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com> > Datum: 27.07.2021 10:18:38 > An: users@nifi.apache.org, Axel Schwarz <axelkop...@emailn.de> > Betreff: Re: No Load Balancing since 1.13.2 > > Hi, > I believe the minor u291 is known to have issues (for some of its early > builds). Did you upgrade the Java versionrecently? > Thanks, Pierre > Le mar. 27 juil. 2021 à 08:07, Axel Schwarz < axelkop...@emailn.de > a > écrit : > Dear Community, > > we're running a secured 3 node Nifi Cluster on Java 8_u291 and Debian 7 and > experiencing > problems with load balancing since version 1.13.2. > > I'm fully aware of Issue Nifi-8643 and tested alot around this, but gotta > say, that this > is not our problem. Mainly because the balance port never binds to localhost, > but also because I > implemented all workarounds under version 1.13.2 and even tried version 1.14.0 > by now, > but load blancingstill does not work. > What we experience is best described as "the primary node balances with > itself"... > > > So what it does is, opening the balancing connections to its own IP instead > of the IPs > of the other two nodes. And the other two nodes don't open balancing > connections > at all. > > When executing "ss | grep 6342" on the primary node, this is what it looks > like: > > [root@nifiHost1conf]# ss | grep 6342 > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51380 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51376 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51378 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51370 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51372 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51376 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51374 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51374 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51366 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51370 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51366 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:51368 > 192.168.1.10:6342 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51372 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51378 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51368 > > tcp ESTAB 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 > 192.168.1.10:51380 > > > Executing it on the other non primarynodes, just returns absolutely nothing. > > > Netstat show the following on each server: > > [root@nifiHost1 conf]# netstat -tulpn > Active Internet connections (only servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State > > PID/Program name > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.10:6342 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 10352/java > > [root@nifiHost2 conf]# netstat -tulpn > Active Internet connections (only servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State > PID/Program name > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:6342 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 31562/java > > [root@nifiHost3 conf]# netstat -tulpn > Active Internet connections (only servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State > > PID/Program name > tcp 0 0 192.168.1.12:6342 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > > 31685/java > > And here is what our load balancing properties look like: > > # cluster load balancing properties # > nifi.cluster.load.balance.host= nifiHost1.contoso.com > nifi.cluster.load.balance.address=0.0.0.0 > nifi.cluster.load.balance.port=6342 > nifi.cluster.load.balance.connections.per.node=4 > nifi.cluster.load.balance.max.thread.count=8 > nifi.cluster.load.balance.comms.timeout=30 sec > > When running Nifi in version 1.12.1 on the exact same setup in the exact > same environment, load balancing is working absolutely fine. > There was a time when load balancing even worked in version 1.13.2. But I'm > not able to reproduce this and it just stopped > working one day after some restart, without changing any property or > whatsoever. > > > If any more information would be helpfulplease let me know and I'll try to > provide it as fastas possible. > > > > Versendet mit Emailn.de - Freemail > > * Unbegrenzt Speicherplatz > * Eigenes Online-Büro > * 24h besten Mailempfang > * Spamschutz, Adressbuch > > > > > Versendet mit Emailn.de - Freemail > > * Unbegrenzt Speicherplatz > * Eigenes Online-Büro > * 24h besten Mailempfang > * Spamschutz, Adressbuch > >
