And if you do not add this new system property what happens for you?

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:28 AM Guillermo Muñoz
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Joe.
>
> Our use case is getting data from a source and ingest it into a kerberized 
> hive. We do it with a PutHive3QL processor, which uses a Hive3ConnectionPool 
> controller service, which uses a KeytabCredentialsService controller service. 
> I'm not pretty sure about what crossrealm is, so I guess we don't use it. We 
> authenticate against the kerberos server where our principal is stored.
> We are going to 292 because of the nifis requirement of being in 251 or 
> later, and not being the last. But we have tested with 311 with the same 
> result. I didnt hear about Azul dist, we will take a look and let you know.
>
> This is the error log:
> 2022-01-27 17:53:27,463 ERROR [Timer-Driven Process Thread-14] 
> o.a.n.c.s.StandardControllerServiceNode 
> StandardControllerServiceNode[service=Hive3ConnectionPool[id=356efabb-5e9d-394c-a719-86b6b65ad2e8],
>  versionedComponentId=null, 
> processGroup=StandardProcessGroup[identifier=78f004f1-f873-3a33-855a-553e0a114b68,name=RADAR_DONE],
>  active=true] Failed to invoke @OnEnabled method due to 
> org.apache.nifi.reporting.InitializationException: 
> org.apache.nifi.util.hive.AuthenticationFailedException: Kerberos 
> Authentication for Hive failed: {}
> org.apache.nifi.reporting.InitializationException: 
> org.apache.nifi.util.hive.AuthenticationFailedException: Kerberos 
> Authentication for Hive failed
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.dbcp.hive.Hive3ConnectionPool.onConfigured(Hive3ConnectionPool.java:435)
>         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor266.invoke(Unknown Source)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodsWithAnnotations(ReflectionUtils.java:142)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodsWithAnnotations(ReflectionUtils.java:130)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodsWithAnnotations(ReflectionUtils.java:75)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodsWithAnnotation(ReflectionUtils.java:52)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.service.StandardControllerServiceNode$2.run(StandardControllerServiceNode.java:432)
>         at org.apache.nifi.engine.FlowEngine$2.run(FlowEngine.java:110)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
>         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Caused by: org.apache.nifi.util.hive.AuthenticationFailedException: Kerberos 
> Authentication for Hive failed
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.util.hive.HiveConfigurator.authenticate(HiveConfigurator.java:94)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.dbcp.hive.Hive3ConnectionPool.onConfigured(Hive3ConnectionPool.java:432)
>         ... 16 common frames omitted
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unable to acquire UGI for KerberosUser: 
> Unable to login with ******************* due to: Message stream modified (41)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.hadoop.SecurityUtil.getUgiForKerberosUser(SecurityUtil.java:109)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.util.hive.HiveConfigurator.authenticate(HiveConfigurator.java:92)
>         ... 17 common frames omitted
> Caused by: javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: Unable to login with 
> ******************* due to: Message stream modified (41)
>         at 
> com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.attemptAuthentication(Krb5LoginModule.java:808)
>         at 
> com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule.login(Krb5LoginModule.java:618)
>         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor226.invoke(Unknown Source)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>         at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invoke(LoginContext.java:755)
>         at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.access$000(LoginContext.java:195)
>         at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(LoginContext.java:682)
>         at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext$4.run(LoginContext.java:680)
>         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>         at 
> javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.invokePriv(LoginContext.java:680)
>         at javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext.login(LoginContext.java:587)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.security.krb.AbstractKerberosUser.login(AbstractKerberosUser.java:81)
>         at 
> org.apache.nifi.hadoop.SecurityUtil.getUgiForKerberosUser(SecurityUtil.java:96)
>         ... 18 common frames omitted
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Regards.
>
> Guille
>
>
> El jue, 27 ene 2022 a las 17:01, Joe Witt (<[email protected]>) escribió:
>>
>> Guille
>>
>> We are trying to be broadly compatible with every Java 8 and Java 11
>> release we can but of course the older they get certain ones become
>> unusable and the newer they get sometimes new behavior are introduced.
>> We test a lot of combinations directly plus we hear a lot from threads
>> like this.  But we simply can't know all/verify combinations.  So
>> generally the answer is 'it should work' but of course sometimes
>> pieces break as the JVM changes.
>>
>> In this case you'll need to tell us more about your configuration for
>> us to really try/consider much.  We'd need to hear about how you use
>> Kerb(do you use cross realm?) and we'd need to see the actual error's
>> you're seeing.  Also why go to 282 now if there are much newer
>> versions available?  I'm not sure about openjdk and its supported
>> status in Java 8.  But you might want to also look at Azul or other
>> JDK providers.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 8:40 AM Guillermo Muñoz Salgado
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We are upgrading Java from OpenJDK1.8.222 to OpenJDK1.8.292, and 
>> > everything seems to be ok except the Kerberos Controller Services. We 
>> > think this issue [1] can be related. To mitigate it we launch NiFi with 
>> > the next property in the bootstrap.conf file: 
>> > java.arg.17=-Dsun.security.krb5.disableReferrals=true, but we get the same 
>> > results.
>> >
>> > Are Kerberos Controller Services compatible with OpenJDK 1.8.282?
>> > Anyone else with similar problems out there?
>> >
>> > I paste our bootstrap.conf:
>> >
>> >
>> > java=java
>> >
>> > preserve.environment=false
>> >
>> > lib.dir=./lib
>> >
>> > conf.dir=./conf
>> >
>> > graceful.shutdown.seconds=20
>> >
>> > java.arg.1=-Dorg.apache.jasper.compiler.disablejsr199=true
>> >
>> > java.arg.2=-Xms4G
>> >
>> > java.arg.3=-Xmx8G
>> >
>> > java.arg.4=-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
>> >
>> > java.arg.5=-Dsun.net.http.allowRestrictedHeaders=true
>> >
>> > java.arg.6=-Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=sun.net.www.protocol
>> >
>> > java.arg.13=-XX:+UseG1GC
>> >
>> > java.arg.14=-Djava.awt.headless=true
>> >
>> > nifi.bootstrap.sensitive.key=
>> >
>> > java.arg.15=-Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/urandom
>> >
>> > java.arg.16=-Djavax.security.auth.useSubjectCredsOnly=true
>> >
>> > java.arg.17=-Dsun.security.krb5.disableReferrals=true
>> >
>> > java.arg.18=-Dzookeeper.admin.enableServer=true
>> >
>> > notification.services.file=./conf/bootstrap-notification-services.xml
>> >
>> > notification.max.attempts=5
>> >
>> > java.arg.curator.supress.excessive.logs=-Dcurator-log-only-first-connection-issue-as-error-level=true
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > --
>> > Guille
>> >
>> > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233512
>
>
>
> --
> Guille

Reply via email to