Thanks for following up!
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 8:37 AM Bjoern Wuest <bjoern.wu...@gmx.net> wrote: > Ok, for those whom it may concern: > > the issue is not in "reading" the file, but merely in the fact that the > file is "stuck" in the processor. Adding "REL_SUCCESS << flowFile" as last > line and things are working. > > Am Fr., 10. Jan. 2025 um 16:26 Uhr schrieb Bjoern Wuest < > bjoern.wu...@gmx.net>: > >> Hi, >> >> I am on nifi 2.1.0 . When executing (even as only line) the command "def >> flowFile = session.get()", I receive the following error message: >> >> ExecuteScript[id=5065aacc-0194-1000-35e2-a707c1752fa8] Processing failed: >> org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException: >> org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.FlowFileHandlingException: >> StandardFlowFileRecord[uuid=ee4f62cf-cec1-4c0e-9cca-03f8e3e877f1,claim=StandardContentClaim >> [resourceClaim=StandardResourceClaim[id=1736514978089-7, container=default, >> section=7], offset=3318, >> length=348084],offset=0,name=30d35e94-0d3e-4e18-a819-5bfc21b6a012,size=348084] >> transfer relationship not specified. This FlowFile was not created in this >> session and was not transferred to any Relationship via >> ProcessSession.transfer() >> - Caused by: >> org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.FlowFileHandlingException: >> StandardFlowFileRecord[uuid=ee4f62cf-cec1-4c0e-9cca-03f8e3e877f1,claim=StandardContentClaim >> [resourceClaim=StandardResourceClaim[id=1736514978089-7, container=default, >> section=7], offset=3318, >> length=348084],offset=0,name=30d35e94-0d3e-4e18-a819-5bfc21b6a012,size=348084] >> transfer relationship not specified. This FlowFile was not created in this >> session and was not transferred to any Relationship via >> ProcessSession.transfer() >> >> I can see that the file with ID ee4f... is in the queue to the >> ExecuteGroovyScript processor. Config of this processor is: >> Script file: empty >> Script body: def flowFile = session.get() >> Failure strategy: rollback >> Additional classpath: empty >> >> Any hint why the flow file is not handed over to the script processor? >> And any idea while the get() fails since it could as well also return a >> "null"? >> >> Thank you >> Bjoern >> >>
