On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:02:47PM +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > 2009/7/23 Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]>: > > It also suggests that an inconsistent state in page cache of B-tree > > nodes hit the function; the function found a dirty page, but the page > > didn't have buffer heads which was supposed to be impossible for the > > b-tree of nilfs. > -> mkfs.nilfs2 -b 1024 /dev/mapper/VG-NilfHome (maybe the problem > is the 1K block size?)
1024 is lower than the page size so that might explain a lot! I think its a missing check in the mkfs.nilfs2 to never allow lower values than the page size for block size.... but Ryusuke can better answer that :-D With regards, Reinoud _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
