On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:47:21AM +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > 2009/7/24 Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]>: > > 1024 is lower than the page size so that might explain a lot! I think its a > > missing check in the mkfs.nilfs2 to never allow lower values than the page > > size for block size.... but Ryusuke can better answer that :-D > > I agree with you, but man page of mkfs.nilfs2 says it can be > 1024/2048/4096/8192. > Of course it can't be > of page size, but that's a VFS problem.
It could be an implementation limit or a bug in the sub-page handling... i dont know linux that much :-S With regards, Reinoud _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
