Ryusuke Konishi wrote: >> The tarball is "nilfs-utils" but debian has "nilfs2-tools" - is there a >> preference, or is this a debian convention that caused the rename?
it's my own aim to get some sort of uniformity with package names in debian, so that we have $filesystem-tools for new packages. new means basically almost anything after e2fsutils. actually, i should rename it from nilfs2-tools to nilfs-tools. unfortunately, in debian we have a quite stupid thing called NEW queue which make such a simple rename have a penalty of 4 to 8 weeks of waiting until ftp-masters unblock it. but i still might do that at some point (unless Ryusuke dislikes it ;). for fedora/rh, if you don't have people with a quirk for uniformity, you might just want to go with the upstream name as it's the way of the least surprise for the user. Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [email protected] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
