On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:04:38 am Daniel Baumann wrote: > i heard, that ocfs2 is called ocfs2 because ocfs1 was oracle intern > only. not sure if that's true though.
No, it's not. :-) OCFS2 is a POSIX compliant filesystem, OCFS isn't. http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/ # Note: OCFS is not intended to be a POSIX compliant file system, there are no # guarantees that timestamp updates or inode changes are similar in behaviour # as other filesystems on the same platform or especially on different # operating systems. Version 1 is specifically designed for Oracle Database # files, create, move, delete and backup. It is well possible that certain OS # commands will show different results, this is not considered a malfunction # inside ocfs. We try when possible and where possible to stick to standard # behaviour with error messages, e.g. ENOSPACE, etc. However, at the minimum, # what is required for Oracle to work properly is implemented, anything more # is not a guarantee. -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
