lol.... thanks for having a sense of humor. This started working when I fixed something in the data I was putting in. A better exception would be nice, but no patch forthcoming from Walrus theCat. Besides, would you trust something written by someone named Walrus theCat?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/26/2013 10:26 PM, Walrus theCat wrote: > >> Ok, I definitely agree that my data size should be higher, but even a zero >> count doesn't necessitate an NPE. This could be tested via some data set >> (ala UCIhttp://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/), as to whether there exists some >> >> threshold where the cross validator doesn't throw NPEs, and that >> information included in the documentation:-D. I think we can all see >> where I'm going with this... haha. >> > > Yes, please send us patches to fix the exceptions and a patch for our > documentation :) > > Jörn >
