Don’t use that paper. The reference should be for Apache OpenNLP 1.9.1 (assuming that is the version you are using). The format will depend on the paper, but there should be a format for software. The format should be something like Apache Software Foundation. Apache OpenNLP. Version 1.9.1. October 28, 2019, https://opennlp.apache.org <https://opennlp.apache.org/>
The date is the date you downloaded the software (or somewhere close to it). Dan > On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Alexandre Rademaker <aradema...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for the reference Dan! It explains a lot! ;-) What about the first > question? What paper should I cite when introducing OpenNLP? According to > http://eacl.org/conferences/, the EACL didn’t occur in 2005 but Google > Scholar lists > > Opennlp: A java-based nlp toolkit > T Morton, J Kottmann, J Baldridge, G Bierner - Proc. EACL, 2005 > > Best, > > -- > Alexandre Rademaker > http://arademaker.github.io > > >> On 28 Oct 2019, at 15:09, Dan Russ <danrus...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Alexandre, >> The Portuguese OpenNLP models are trained on the CoNLL-X bosque data. >> https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W06-2920/ >> <https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W06-2920/>. Take a look at the third >> column of the table at http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/models-1.5/ >> <http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/models-1.5/> for the rows starting with pt. >> Dan >> >
