Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Oct 2019, at 16:46, Dan Russ <danrus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Don’t use that paper. The reference should be for Apache OpenNLP 1.9.1 > (assuming that is the version you are using). The format will depend on the > paper, but there should be a format for software. The format should be > something like Apache Software Foundation. Apache OpenNLP. Version 1.9.1. > October 28, 2019, https://opennlp.apache.org <https://opennlp.apache.org/> > > The date is the date you downloaded the software (or somewhere close to it). > Dan > > > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Alexandre Rademaker <aradema...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Thank you for the reference Dan! It explains a lot! ;-) What about the first >> question? What paper should I cite when introducing OpenNLP? According to >> http://eacl.org/conferences/, the EACL didn’t occur in 2005 but Google >> Scholar lists >> >> Opennlp: A java-based nlp toolkit >> T Morton, J Kottmann, J Baldridge, G Bierner - Proc. EACL, 2005 >> >> Best, >> >> -- >> Alexandre Rademaker >> http://arademaker.github.io >> >> >>>> On 28 Oct 2019, at 15:09, Dan Russ <danrus...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alexandre, >>> The Portuguese OpenNLP models are trained on the CoNLL-X bosque data. >>> https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W06-2920/ >>> <https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W06-2920/>. Take a look at the third >>> column of the table at http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/models-1.5/ >>> <http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/models-1.5/> for the rows starting with pt. >>> Dan >>> >> >
