On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:26 +0100, Olaf Felka wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton schrieb: > > I have submitted it issue > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42009 > > but it was closed as WORKSFORME at the same time the qa person asked for > > more information. So I am would like to ask the users if they have seen > > this release of OOo crash when activating java from Tools > Options. > > > > > > Just one correction: I didn't close the issue as WORKSFORME, I've just > changed the resolution and and added the keyword 'needmoreinfo'. By now > this issue is really closed. It's duplicate to 41437. >
As far as I am concerned changing the resolution of any issue without investigation is closing/dismissing the issue. This kind of action is too often done especially when the error report is included in the issue. That I missed finding the earlier issue is more a fault of Issue Tracker which we all know is iffy at best. Since you resolved the issue as worksforme I can only gather that you either do not use Gnome or that you had previously applied the workaround from 41437. I suggest that when you do not understand what is in an issue you only change the resolution to started and ask for more information. I understand the key words and look for them but others may not. I would also recommend that you actually test using the same platform. Workforme on a windows box such as yours is very likely different that Solaris or Linux seeing as these are the OSes that use Gnome. You might also see about fixing which headers you employ. Post To is not one that is normally available and it inserts garbage typical of a windows box. -- Documentation Co-Lead PLEASE - keep list traffic on the list. Email sent directly to me may be ignored utterly. "Dinna meddle wi' things ye ken nuthin' aboot!" J.Herriot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
