G Roderick Singleton wrote: > Why throw good money after bad. I recall a long discussion about use of > HSQLDB and how it was superior to SQLite et cetera.
http://dba.openoffice.org/miscellaneous/dba20.html#whynot_sqlite claims that HSQLDB is the only one that met their requirements. What are those requirements? The link on that page is dead. The Way Back Machine did not archive that page, because of the Robots.txt message. >I for one am not. It seems to me that a database that is known to work with OOo, would be better to use, than one whose usage is uncertain. OTOH, if one of the requirements is that everything must be written in Java, then HSQLDB makes sense. Is this why OOo 2.0 RC1 was not released in Dec 2004, as scheduled? [Especially since there was an announcement to that effect in late October.] xan jonathon -- Want a Gmail account? send me a request. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
