In truth, I suspect/hope that the senders are clever enough to (B)CC: the OP. My contention is that these repeats add nothing but noise to the list as there isn't any new information. If the OP is deluged with copies of the posts responding directly to the question, it is a result of not registering and they are in complete control of that step.
Doug
Joe wrote:
I'm not sure, but I assumed this was to show the list that somebody responded to the post so others wouldn't have to.
Joe
Doug Thompson wrote:
Perhaps the answer is obvious to everyone but me.
If it is suspected the person (OP) may not have seen a reply on the list because they aren't subscribed, how does one conclude the OP will see some additional response and that it is reasonable to clutter the list with these posts?
I suggest it would be more useful to reply directly *ONLY* to the OP and not copy the list. </rant>
Doug
XXX wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2005 18:47, + so-and-so wrote:
[ MODERATED ] *********************** Dear Sir,
-----------8<-------Blah bla(snip)----------
Regards
As you are not subscribed you may not have seen that:
------8<---snip-snip-snip-snip-snip-------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
