On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 07:51 -0500, Dan Lewis wrote: > On Wednesday 11 May 2005 06:53 am, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 20:07 -0400, Paul B. wrote: > > > > [snipped] > > > > > Now that the situation is clarified, I will consider filing a > > > RFE. Whether here or there, the problem required discussion. It > > > seems to me that this is a good place for preliminary discussion. > > > Please let me know if I'm seeing this incorrectly. > > > > > > Paul > > > > I still recommend filing an issue as the first step. Your idea has > > value which is why I suggested filing. By filing you also preserve > > the idea so it doesn't get lost. Developers actually do look at RFEs > > although with trying to get 2.0 out the door they may be a mite busy. > > I know the help doc team is. > > > > Once you have an issue in place, I would try the discussion in lists > > where there are likely to be developers, such as discuss, dev et > > cetera. In fact [email protected] may be the place. > > > > In any case, discussing the technical merits of any idea on users is > > a bad idea when it can go on. Well you get the idea. > > > > Do let us know the issue number here so those interested can vote, > > comment, help get it evaluated and implemented if possible. > In an attempt to answer for Paul, it seems that you may have missed > my post to this issue. There is a way to do what he wants through the > use of F11. I described how to do that, and he replied that this works. > The problem came from a difference in how to access styles between the > 1.X and 2.0 versions. (If you want a copy of what I wrote, I can send > it to you for documentation purposes.) >
PLEASE! Off-line though. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
