There's already a closed issue about this. The maintainers (at least those who responded to the issue) don't feel it's a bug. It may not be in that it works as designed however I do agree that being able to specify where nulls sort would be very helpful.
I've opened a new issue, an enhancement request. Vote for it here if you like. http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93576 For your reference the old issue, reported as a bug and closed, is.... [Issue 11145] empty cells not considered in sort / cannot change order To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11145 On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:52 PM, JChimene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In 2.4 how does one force empty fields to the top of a sorted range? It > seems > that they always wind up at the end of the range. > > ### > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
