Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: >> > > Go to community.languagetool.org > > It seems that you can help with rule development. That said, no language > checker will likely flag every transgression every time. Even if it did > manage to do so, you would be very unhappy with the results.
That I understand. I am also quite confident that the tools is being improved in the new OOo version. I am going to test that when it comes out. But you are right, no grammar tools is going to be perfect. But as I noted in one my past posts, no sane writer expects that. The tools is used only to flag some common mistakes. That is what it is useful for, not to correct grammar perfectly. If a tools doesn't even do that minimum stuff properly, then of course it is useless. As I pointed to queequeg earlier, the LanguageTools doesn't appear to flag the mistakes that queequeg does in its example does. Not one mistake! That is what surprised me. > > A new API is in progress, and much of it is ready for OOo 3.0. New > versions of the language tools will use the new APIs. Good to know. >> Wonder how LanguageTool's development is tied with OOo's. >> > The developers of this add-on worked with the OOo developers, which does > not mean that they wrote the code, just that they commented and provided > feedback during API development. Okay. Thanks, and warm regards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
