On 05/01/2009 03:12 PM, JOE Conner wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> >> Perhaps one of you guys can test in WinXP w/3.1? I can try w/linux, but >> can't do it for a few more hours. Note that 63671 also references: >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59745 >> which I _think_ is exactly what Brian is describing. >> >> <quote> >> Description: Opened: Sat Dec 24 22:37:00 +0000 2005 Sort >> by: Oldest >> first | Newest first >> >> If you sort a bunch of cells, the position of the notes for those cells >> does not change, which can leave the notes very far from the cells that >> they describe (maybe not even on the same screen) with very long arrows. >> >> I would suggest moving the notes so that their position relative to the >> cells they describe is preserved during the sort (with some adjustment >> to avoid having any notes move off of the edge of the spreadsheet). >> This approach may be imperfect, but the current approach is very >> annoying if the region being sorted is large. >> </quote> >> ------- Additional comments from vladimir_hitekschool Tue Mar 31 >> 23:58:14 +0000 2009 ------- >> >> Issue 59745 has been fixed in master version OOo-dev 3.1 .0 (OOO310m7 >> Build:9393) for Windows XP and can be closed. >> >> Gary > I just tested using OOo v3.10 RC2 in XP Pro, and the position and > orientation of the notes does follow the associated cells for me now. I > also tested in addition to sorting test by inserting rows and columns > which formerly scrambled the notes terribly but all seems to be happy > for me now. KUDOS to the developers! > > Joe Conner, Poulsbo, WA USA
Thanks for testing! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
