Yes, this is exactly what I am describing. If you need someone to test anything, I have no problem. so by the last comment, the issue is fixed? //
NoOp wrote: > On 05/01/2009 01:44 PM, JOE Conner wrote: > >> See Issue http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51769 >> and Issue http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73145 >> ans others similar. These bug reports have been closed, but it does NOT >> mean that the issue has been fixed. >> > > 73145 has been marked a dup of > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 > > Perhaps one of you guys can test in WinXP w/3.1? I can try w/linux, but > can't do it for a few more hours. Note that 63671 also references: > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59745 > which I _think_ is exactly what Brian is describing. > > <quote> > Description: Opened: Sat Dec 24 22:37:00 +0000 2005 Sort > by: Oldest > first | Newest first > > If you sort a bunch of cells, the position of the notes for those cells > does not change, which can leave the notes very far from the cells that > they describe (maybe not even on the same screen) with very long arrows. > > I would suggest moving the notes so that their position relative to the > cells they describe is preserved during the sort (with some adjustment > to avoid having any notes move off of the edge of the spreadsheet). > This approach may be imperfect, but the current approach is very > annoying if the region being sorted is large. > </quote> > ------- Additional comments from vladimir_hitekschool Tue Mar 31 > 23:58:14 +0000 2009 ------- > > Issue 59745 has been fixed in master version OOo-dev 3.1 .0 (OOO310m7 > Build:9393) for Windows XP and can be closed. > > Gary > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
