I'm sorry, I hit "reply" by mistake before answering the second part of your message.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 13:16:52 PM -0400, Web Kracked wrote: > So lets "put up or shut up". You experts in ODF that want to > correct the wrongs, do something about it. Create the proper info > site and get it linked to as many places as you can. I think you're confusing "link to" with "linked from". The authors of a website only control the first links, but can't do much (even if that website *is* the best source on a given argument) to have it linked from other websites. > Can you do this with ODF? Can that "OpenDocument Fellowship" people > get their message out there that they might be a better place than > Wikipedia? We *are* a better source of ODF info than Wikipedia. It's not really our fault if Wikipedia has the reputation it has. This said: > I get mad a people that will complain but will not help with the > solving the problem. maybe I missed something at the beginning of the thread, but at least as far as I'm concerned, I'm not complaining and there's no problem to solve at all. I care very, very little about the quality of ODF info at Wikipedia and never link to it anyway. Me, I stepped in to point out why, in general, it's useless to spend time trying to fix Wikipedia when it gets something wrong. Marco -- Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how software is used *around* you: http://digifreedom.net/node/84 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
