> David B Teague wrote: > > > But they do maintain standards, and their editors go through the articles.
bg: At least they *claim* they maintain standards. jonathon wrote: > Their standards are such, that an article with demonstrably false > claims and statements in it, can't be corrected, if the corrections, > even if correctly cited, go against the collective ignorance of > the Wikipedia administrators. bg: Or, often as not, particularly WRT any subject even slightly political, the collectivist bias of the Wikipedia editors :-) I, and practically everyone I know, consider Wikipedia a bad joke. Brewster -- ********************************************************************** W. Brewster Gillett [email protected] Portland, OR USA ********************************************************************** Simply because you don't like to hear it, that doesn't make it untrue. ********************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
