Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2009/10/12 4:37 PM Harold Fuchs wrote:
Apologies. I did not see that you had sent a copy to the OP.
Just out of curiosity, why did you send it separately and not simply
include the OP in the To: or cc: list of your reply where it would be
more noticeable?
Headers from my copy of the post I sent:
BCC: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:54:52 -0600
From: Larry Gusaas <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.openoffice.questions
Subject: Re: wrong software downloaded
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
The OP failed to read " Do Not reply to me personally but just to the
list at <[email protected]> - replies to my personal email address
will be ignored." and sent me a thank you note to my personal address.
That is another reason unsubscribed posters should not be allowed. I
think I will stick to the forum to provide support.
Larry
You did Bcc:. So I didn't see that the OP had received a copy. The "As a
courtesy ..." is part of your sig. Who reads sigs? A simple cc: instead
of Bcc: and I would have noticed that you had sent a copy to the OP and ...
On the other hand, why are you so upset that the OP got two copies? I
can sort of understand your annoyance at receiving a personal response
but why worry about the OP getting an extra one? By the by, any messages
I get *personally* to this address are sent automatically (by filter) to
the waste bin without me ever seeing them let alone reading them.
--
Harold Fuchs
London, England
Please reply *only* to [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
