On 2010-02-25 8:11 PM, jonathon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:53, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> I have yet to see one law that actually requires this, when you actually >> read it. > > You have to look at both the case law, and the statute law, and the > regulatory law. > The precise wording might not be stipulated, but the general statement > of what is to be included is made.
I regurgitate my original comment. The laws referenced in general *do* *not* require this stupid disclaimer on all outbound email. Morons require it 'just to be safe'... -- Charles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
