In news:[email protected],
Tanstaafl <[email protected]> typed:
On 2010-02-25 8:11 PM, jonathon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:53, Tanstaafl wrote:
I have yet to see one law that actually requires this, when you
actually read it.
You have to look at both the case law, and the statute law, and the
regulatory law.
The precise wording might not be stipulated, but the general
statement of what is to be included is made.
I regurgitate my original comment.
The laws referenced in general *do* *not* require this stupid
disclaimer on all outbound email.
Morons require it 'just to be safe'...
The preceding posts might have been billious and worse, but your comment
here is totally uncalled for. Please refrain from such opinionated spews.
Better to ignore than to ignite flames, especially on a moderated group.
Twayne
--
--
Newsgroups are great places to get assistance.
But always verify important information with
other sources to be certain you have a clear
understanding of it and that it is accurate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
