On 2010-03-14 2:08 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2010/03/14 8:32 AM Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 3/14/2010 10:12 AM, Programmer In Training wrote: >>> On 03/14/10 09:05, Tanstaafl wrote: >>>> On 3/14/2010 12:09 AM, Programmer In Training wrote: >>>>>>> I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix >>>>>>> yourself and then OpenOffice.org saves in that format >>>>>>> automatically? I don't know, didn't try it myself since I refuse >>>>>>> to save as anything but ODF.
>>>> That's how The GIMP works... >>> I didn't type that. Please correctly attribute what you quote. >> You're complaining to the wrong person. The post I replied to was >> already lacking the proper attributions for all of the quotes. Of >> course, recognizing that the number of quote characters doesn't match up >> with the quote attributions would make it plain that you in fact didn't >> author the particular quoted text I was replying to, for anyone who >> cares that much... > He is complaining to the right person. You clipped the attributions in > the message you replied to, which contained the attribution for the part > you replied to. Yep, you're right, my bad, and apologies to PIT... it was the *preceding* quote attribution that PIT left out - ie, there were three blocks of quoted text, but only two attributions, so when I saw one was missing, I decided it was too much trouble to take the time to correct for such a trivial comment. Obviously others here are far more anal about such trivialities... Now, how about we end the OT irrelevancies... -- Charles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
