On 23/03/2010 00:27, Jan van Hoek wrote:
I'm running the English 3.2.0 on 64 bit Windows 7 (Home Premium).
It installed without problems,
Thanks for this. I have Windows 7 Home Ultimate, but that should not
make much difference. And, not withstanding my Dutch background, I've
also an English version of Windows, so that should not be a factor
either.
I was referring to the version of OO.o and indicating that it was the
English variant, *NOT* the standard American one. Some thoughtful soul
packaged the final .rc which saved me a fair amount of time. ;-)
The only obvious difference between our systems is that you have the
"Ultimate" variant of Windows 7. I see no obvious reason for this to be
a problem, *BUT* it is a difference.
(...) although, as a matter of principle, I removed 3.1.1 first
which may, or may not be relevant.
After a few failed attempts to install 3.2, I've also removed the
"old" 3.1 version. That did not help.
My Windows 7 PC is relatively new. Does not contain (yet) an overload
of software. See ATTACHMENT. Nothing out of the ordinary, I should
say.
Your attachment did not make this list. If you think it relevant you may
send it to me privately.
By the way: I installed 3.2 on two other PC's (both Vista, 32-bit)
without incident, superseding the 3.1 version. Given your experience
that the 64- bit does not seem to matter, plus that the 7 in windows
7 does not matter as well, I'm at a loss what really goes wrong in my
case.
So am I! I think I must be getting too old for remote diagnosis. :-)
Peter HB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
