On 05/26/2010 02:51 PM, Jerry Clancy wrote: > > "Barbara Duprey" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> The reason for the change is that internally, OOo is working in the ODF >> world. So for a text document, whatever format comes in is translated to >> the appropriate ODF type for editing (even if none actually occurs), and >> then whatever format is required for the output is generated from the ODF >> type. The input and output filters are not aware of each other at all. In >> this case, it seems that some of the incoming RTF information is lost >> (apparently on output to RTF, since you report that it is captured into >> the .doc file OK). > > I had assumed that. It was my conclusion as well. I would appear that the > information is lost/scrambled on saving what is now internal ODF back to > RTF. If I save to DOC format the information is preserved. The developers > may want to look at their RTF mapping process and the handling of HYPERLINKs > in particular.
Even MS$ doesn't handle RFT properly from MSO version to MSO version. RTF is an abortion. Try saving a complex RTF from Word 97 and opening in Word 2x or later & back and see what you end up with. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
