Tanstaafl [mailto:[email protected]] observed: > > On 2010-06-29 1:08 PM, JOE Conner wrote: > > On 6/29/2010 2:35 AM, Lars Nooden wrote: > >> Dean, Tom, everyone interesting in Engineering Notation, > >> > >> Please remember at least to vote for the official bug report: > >> > >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5930 > > > I see 134 votes for this at the moment. How many votes is > required for > > implementation work? > > Only 5,234...
I just voted... I think... so another 5,099 of you, get going. What a weird process. Having blundered through it, I guess I understand how it works, and what is expected, but ... now I know how the otherwise sane and rational OOo can suddenly expose strange little corners and pockets of... um... functionality... that are entirely orthogonal to human. They're made by the extra-terrestrial entity that designed the issue voting. Of course. :-) - Kevin (it's Voguns, I tell you... Voguns) The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
