To be honest I would suggest you raise a bug report, carefully
describe what you are doing and post the links to the examples in the
report.

This will mean that those that can find the error quicker (eg, the
developers) have access to all the information.

/pual

On 6/23/05, RS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I found a weird bug problem with OO.org writer 1.9.104 on Windows XP.
> 
> I created an .odt with text, some frames with pictures inside, and
> custom styles. Then, I was given a .doc template, I opened it with open
> office, and saved it as an .odt. Then I began copying and pasting text
> and frames from my first .odt to the new template, and created some more
> styles. I saved it without errors, closed OpenOffice, and when I tried
> opening it again to continue editing it, I got the following error:
> 'Format error discovered in sub-document styles.xml at 2,3388 (lin,col)'.
> 
> I looked at styles.xml, but I don't know its format so could not find
> anything wrong.
> 
> This has happened me two times, but I didn't have the time to find the
> exact step in which the .odt gots corrupted. I reverted back to OO.org
> stable, it doesn't seem to happen in with 1.1.4
> 
> Here are the .doc template and the already corrupted .odt:
> - http://www.iasted.org/conferences/formatting/FinalManuscriptTemplate.doc
> - www.galeon.com/xdcdx/format_error.odt
> 
> I don't really want to recover the document, as I started again using
> 1.1.4, I'm sending this email so somebody can look inside the corrupted
> .odt and help me submit a more detailed bug report (or submit the bug
> report yourself if you wish).
> 
> If you need more information just ask.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ricardo Sanchez
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to