Harold Fuchs wrote:
"James Knott" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 03/11/2010 14:54, James Knott wrote:
Harold, you might want to check your computer clock. It appears
you sent this message on Sunday. One thing I recommend is to
configure computers to use NTP, which sets the clock very accurately.
Errm. Yes, I did send it on Sunday. At about twenty to eight in the
evening my time. Why do you feel it necessary to comment or to think
that my computer clock may be wrong? I use NIST's time server.
My apologies. I was surprise to see email that took 3 days to
arrive. It's almost as though you sent it via the post office. ;-)
Generally, when there's a significant discrepancy between post and
arrival times, it's due to a mis-configured clock.
According to the message headers, you sent it on Oct 31 @ 14:35and
was received by the list on Nov 3 @ 19:37 or 3 days and 5 hours
later. I wonder where it was for all that time? Generally, this
list is quick to forward messages.
Yes, I think my ISP must have been playing silly beggars.
In this case the round trip from me to you and then receiving your reply
was about 10 minutes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
