Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> lost. Being succesfully defended at court, the patent is quite solid so >> noone can implement a smilar system for the next maybe > > The prior art for that patent is 10 000 _years_ old.
And, did that help? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
