On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 17:52 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote: > On Sunday 26 June 2005 5:14 pm, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 16:40 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote: > > > On Sunday 26 June 2005 2:05 am, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > 2) If possible, d/l the latest 2.0 beta and see if the problem is > > > > fixed. While it is not a short term fix, at least we will know that the > > > > problem will be resolved when 2.0 comes out. > > > > > > No it won't, NOT unless coders realize that for Linux, OO MUST see what > > > printer(s) are defined in CUPS, THEN all will be well. > > > > > > Fred > > > > I cannot verify your statement. 2.0 does, indeed, offer ALL defined > > printers including a fax machine if you install one. > > Sorry.......It DOESN'T. Your statement might better be, "it's supposed to" > and > "often does" but it DOESN'T all the time. PLUS 2.0 is broken, in that you > can't add a printer. > > Fred >
Fred, All I can say is that OOo2 does what I say on my system. I find that it readily recognizes printers enabled via the OS tools. So you have one dissenting vote. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
