So many of these SPF arrangements are flakey. This is off-track from getting you tied into bugzilla again, but I notice this oddity.
If you go to openspf.org with the pasted-together URL they supply, it seems that [my address] is a problem! Also, I have no idea when it says "bad destination address" when it is apparently the sender address that is a problem. But I regularly see that in messages like the one you received. Did you patch that "[my address]" into the message below? Since there are apparently not a lot of problems about this, I would check with your ISP first. (I have trouble because I use a From: that is different from the Sender: and the From: is the address of a vanity forwarding (@acm.org) that I can't originate mail through. But ooo-dev was not a problem for me.) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 11:56 To: [email protected] Subject: [users] Re: Re: Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > 2. Was the bounce from ooo-dev itself or from someone on the list whose > e-mail system bounced your post? (I'm asking because I get these from > various individual users but not from the lists themselves.) It was from my ISP's mail server (postmaster at anakin.london.02.net), saying mx1.eu.apache.org didn't accept the message: - These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server: ooo-dev at incubator.apache.org; Failed; 5.1.1 (bad destination mailbox address) Remote MTA mx1.eu.apache.org: SMTP diagnostic: 550 SPF forgery: Please see http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=[my address]&ip=87.194.255.134&receiver=nike.apache.org [ ... ] -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] For additional commands send email to [email protected] with Subject: help
