Please do *not* start a new question by replying to an old one as this
causes several problems:
1. most email software will correctly think that your email is a
response to the email you are "replying" to, and will indicate
this by displaying your email as a child of the original email
2. because of this, people not interested in the original email may
ignore your question
3. people may think that the original email has a reply(yours) so
that they do not have to give it a reply
So in conclusion, more people will read your email if it looks like the
start of a new thread rather than the reply to an old one.
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 18:23 -0300, J. Randal Matheny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:12:35 -0300, "J. Randal Matheny"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I'm using the bibliography database for a document. In the text, the
> > short name is inserted as a field for the author reference. So far, so
> > good.
> >
> > Now I want to create an author index using the short-name field as the
> > index entry. So far, I haven't seen how to do that. Any hints? (I hope
> > this is clear.)
>
> Did I miss the answer to this somewhere? I didn't see it come down the
> hopper if it did.
>
I suspect because the list is threaded, anyone who does know or has
experience with the bibiliography database has not seen your question.
It is still buried in the thread you used.
As for an answer, I do not really know but the bibliography is a dBase
file and it is likely possible. While you wait for a more authoritative
answer, dig out your old dB3/4 manuals and try it.
--
PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST.
OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead
http://documentation.openoffice.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
