On Saturday 16 July 2005 11:31, Johan Vromans wrote: > "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 13:40 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote: > >> So far, I've found the following unfavorable things about RC-1. > >> 4) It won't save in the open format. > > > > I DO hope you entered issues for each of these into Issue > > Tracker as this is the best way to have such problems evaluated. > > I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. > > Some time ago, I was discussing an issue with the developers for wich > a patch was available. This patch could not be not applied, since > "there was no time left (before the next release) to run it through > the QA tests." > > While this may sound well at first hearing (it did to me), I am very > afraid that these QA procedures are starting to backfire. There are > far too many issues outstanding than even the excellent OOo > development teams can sort out, let alone solve. As a result, many > issues are just overlooked or even ignored. > > Many of my issues have been in state NEW or STARTED for years. It > certainly doesn't inspire me to keep entering new issues. > > Sorry to be so negative.
The QA team can always do with more help. Why not spend one/two hours a week helping them http://qa.openoffice.org -- CPH : openoffice.org contributor Maybe your question has been answered already? http://user-faq.openoffice.org/#FAQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
