So, it's for paranoid programmers. Who's going to bother your silly programs?
Drop the pretenses, and get rid of the signature. Life is hard enough as it is. Joe On 8/12/05, Joel Wiramu Pauling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh I see what you mean. Well, no offence intended an' all, and in my very > > humble opinion, PGP signing is a gimmick or a toy employed by paranoid > > souls and wannabe geeks in an attempt to ensure secure e-mail > > communication. I wish I could help you with your problem, but why not take > > a leaf from my book -- if I were to receive an e-mail on a mailing list and > > the sender used some or other method to obfuscate his message, I simply > > reach for the delete button and move on with my life. > Signing has a few advantages. > > Say for instance I was submitting a diff patchset or sending a file. If > I sign the e-mail message it's easy for the person committing that file > to check to see if the patch has been altered. > > It's not just for the paranoid, and it's certainly not a gimick. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
