David Teague wrote:

There is an article in Linux Journal by Tom Adelstein on how
to speed up loading  OpenOffice.org. Here is a link:

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8308     .............

[Under Windows XP it cuts the load time from about 100 seconds
to about 20 seconds] ..............

"In the above figure, you can see that we selected the first expansion box and then clicked Memory with our mouse. This exposed the window you see in Figure 3. I changed the default values under the Graphics cache for Use for OpenOffice.org and Memory per Object. I increased the first value from 6 to 128MB. I also increased the second value from .5 to 20MB.

"After clicking OK, I closed the word processor and reopened it two times. On each occasion, the application took less time to open. Under Ubuntu, I found that OO Writer opened in three seconds, and in Fedora it opened in less than six seconds. Previously, it took 30 and 26 seconds,
respectively, for the word processor to launch. .................

This hack reduced startup time for my Windows system from an
annoying 15-20 seconds with the quick starter to 2 - 3 seconds
(also with the quick-starter). .....etc..

**************************************************************
Thanks for the tip, David;

Even though I'm only a second class citizen with my XP SP2, I applied the Linux adjustments to my own Writer> Tools > Options > OpenOffice.org > Memory:

         Graphics Cache / Use for OpenOffice.org  raised to 128mb
/ Memory per object raised to 20mb

After two or three startups I clocked Writer 1.9.125 first opening from Quickstart [snicker] to text doc at 17sec.
That is considerably better than the 30+ seconds it has been taking.

This is getting down to the neighborhood of a true "quickstart" -- not the 6 sec you spoke of, but what would I do with an extra 11 seconds anyway? Probably something silly.

Richard McB

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to