I've sent an invite to Michael. (only 99 left). So the rest of the gmail users don't need to, or at least hold it to the posting latency...
On 9/6/05, Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 02:05:02 +0100 > CPHennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:43, Paul wrote: > > > Point taken. I've also had this issue in the past, but with the > > > amount of mails that require moderating the downstream effect gets > > > overlooked. > > > /paul > > > > > > On 9/6/05, john geldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > FWIW, a suggestion for the moderators: if there is no subject, add > > > > the applicant's email to separate the threads. > > > > > > > > Gmail which does well with threads, just mixes these all together. > > > > Sorry guys, but please ask gmail to fix their threading algorythm. My > > mail client (KMail) has no problems with getting the threading right. > > Also note that moderators only have the power to accept /reject a mail > > for moderation. They have no control over the content. > > > > Sylpheed gets it right too. But do you have a GMail invite fellas. Time > i had a look at all the fuss. I hear google is at 6000 linux servers and > going for 10000 by christmas. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
